![]() A kind of neutral interim before later being able to build upon it. I assume it could be an easier interim than looking for streamlining packages from different « styling ». ![]() The interim is certainly concerning and I wonder if UbuntuBudgie should better work with libadwaita and yaru… both already existing and « fitting » sort of. In the other way round, maybe Qt consumers should go towards a common ground styling strategy… LibreOffice pulls this system theme setting and makes the file/edit/view etc menu backgrounds dark (I dislike the modern ribbon layout - the greatest among many advantages over MS Word). Qt and Gtk* matching is another matter - and even there, a common Gtk* ground will ease life, at least in a Qt context. Sounds to my ignorance like a simplification over actual mess between gtk*, libhandy and else. If or when libadwaita will be the de facto standard « base-style » then it will leave room for building upon one common predictable structure / style-sheet / name it. They look for a streamlined experience of maintaining their work - we can’t blame them for that.īut while doing that it ruins a part of the users experience and the ability for DE to « look » coherent and predictable ( if DE’s don’t build their style upon libadwaita ).īut Gnome is not « themeless » - yeah it seems for the moment - I think Gnome is looking forward for a shared and sane « styling base ». Mmm… some dev’s insisted that users should not change the style of their app’īut do users want each app’ to have its own style ?ĭev’s generally don’t care about users experience but they do care about their own app’s and ways to maintain it efficiently / easily while different « styling method » might interfere in the maintaining process.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |